You have an idea about a stock. That's not a trade.
It’s a hope, a bias, a narrative you're telling yourself.
The market doesn't pay for stories.
A real trade begins the moment you can say, "If price does X, I am wrong." If you can't define that exact point of
You are outsourcing your risk management to luck.
That is how accounts bleed out.
Pressure tells you a move might happen.
Structure tells you where you have control.
Without structure, you have nothing.
My framework is built on this.
I don't look for entries.
I look for the structure that defines my risk.
This structure isn't a vague zone on a chart. It’s a hard line.
It could be a key prior low, the Volume- Weighted Average Price, or the bottom of an overnight gap.
It is a specific price where the behavior of buyers and sellers proves my thesis incorrect.
That is my invalidation level.
It's the first thing I find.
Only after I know where I’m wrong do I look for the trigger.
The trigger is the specific event that tells me the move is starting.
It’s not just "price went up." It’s the reclaim of a key level.
It’s the successful defense of a support area on high volume.
It's a precise, observable action that confirms the pressure I identified is beginning to force a move. I don't
I wait for the trigger, then I act.
This gives me clarity.
Imagine a stock gaps from 50 to 55 on news.
The pressure is on the shorts.
My structure is the gap floor at 50.
If it trades below that, the gap failed and my long thesis is invalid.
My trigger might be the first time it pulls back to 55.50, holds, and turns up. Now my risk is defined.
The distance between my entry and my invalidation at 50 is my cost to see if I'm right.
This is how you stop guessing and start trading.
The structure dictates the risk, the trigger starts the clock, and the asymmetry makes it worth playing.